■

ハトを轢き殺したおっさんが不起訴らしいけど、供述を見る限りおっさんは異常だがそれを通報するやつも異常だし、そんなくだらない事件の"容疑"者の名前を報道するメディアも異常。
そこに公共性はあるか？名誉棄損で民事訴訟してほしい。供述が面白いからネタ（金）になると思って報道したんだろ

I heard that the old man who ran over and killed a pigeon was not prosecuted, but as far as I can see from his statement, the old man is crazy, but the person who reported it is also crazy, and the media that reports the name of the "suspect" in such a trivial case is also crazy.
Is there any public interest there? I hope they file a civil suit for defamation. You reported it because you thought it would be a good story (money) because the statement was interesting.

不起訴とは、検察官が被疑者を起訴しないという決定をすることです。 不起訴処分になると、被疑者は刑事裁判にかけられることがありません。 それまで勾留されていた場合にも、身柄を解放されますし、有罪になる可能性も0％となります。 不起訴処分は、晴れて「無罪放免」になるのとほとんど同じです。

An indictment is a decision by the prosecutor not to prosecute a suspect. If an indictment is dropped, the suspect will not be subjected to a criminal trial. If the suspect was previously detained, he or she will be released from custody, and there is a 0% chance of conviction. An indictment is almost the same as a "not guilty" verdict.

ハトを轢き殺したと因縁つけられて逮捕されたタクシー運転手が不起訴処分で終わったのだと。当然だ。徳川綱吉の時代の生類憐れみの令じゃないんだから、こんなくだらないことで刑事裁判にかけられてたまるか。クレーマーから通報受けたからって、逮捕すること自体が不当なんだよ

A cab driver who was arrested for allegedly running over and killing pigeons ended up being dropped from the case. Of course. It's not like the Decree for Pity for All Living Things in the days of Tsunayoshi Tokugawa, so why should he be put on criminal trial for such a trivial matter? Arresting someone just because you received a report from a complainer is unjust in itself.

そもそも不慮の事故で野生のハトを轢き殺してしまったことが犯罪になるなら、行政は野生のハトが車道に入らないように対策を取る必要があるんよ
わざとやってるわけじゃないんだから不起訴で当然なんだわ

If running over and killing wild pigeons by accident is a crime, then the government needs to take measures to prevent wild pigeons from entering the roadway.
Since he didn't do it on purpose, he deserves to be prosecuted.

不起訴になった理由を国民に説明しないと同じことが起こる気がする
エアガン撃って殺したわけではないしね
徳川綱吉を思い出させる事件でした ハトひき殺したとして逮捕 タクシー運転手の男性を不起訴処分

I have a feeling the same thing will happen if they don't explain to the public why the indictment was dropped.
And it's not like he shot an air gun and killed them.
It was a case that reminded me of Tsunayoshi Tokugawa, the cab driver who was arrested for hitting and killing pigeons, and they dropped the charges against him.