■

裁判を見据えて、決定的なことを第二弾で出すのを控えたのでは？文春の思惑を考えると…第二弾を甘くすることでもしや松本さん側を油断させたかったのかも？それにより松本さんが強気に出たところで、大きな爆弾を落とすつもりかな？とかも勘ぐってしまいます。 今回、最初に文春が出した飲み会（パーティー？）は性加害認定はもしや文春も難しいと認識しているかもしれません。だから松本さんの事実無根という反撃も想定内。しかし、もし、本当に松本さんがこのような低俗的な遊びを数年に渡って繰り返していたとしたら中には同意なき性行為もあり、そっちの証拠をつかんでいる可能性もありませんか？あくまでも想像です。真相はどうなんでしょう…

With an eye on the trial, didn't they refrain from putting out something definitive in the second bullet point? Considering Bunshun's intention... maybe they wanted to catch Mr. Matsumoto's side off guard by sweetening the second bullet point? And if Mr. Matsumoto came out of the woodwork, maybe he was planning to drop a big bomb on him? I have a hunch.
The drinking party (party?) that Bunshun first put out this time is a sex-assault certification, Bunshun may be aware that it is difficult to do so. So, Matsumoto-san's counterattack that there is no factual basis is also to be expected. However, if Mr. Matsumoto really had repeated such vulgar games for several years, isn't it possible that some of them were sex acts without consent, and he may have obtained evidence of that? This is just my imagination. I wonder what the truth is...

全くずれた意見なんだろうけど、渡部にしても松ちゃんにしても、女性を女性として扱ってれば問題にならなかったとも思う。やるだけやって一万円って・・
たけし軍団が殿は女性スキャンダルで揉めた芸人を見ながら、金渡さなきゃ駄目だよって笑いながら言ってたとも聞いたし、火野正平も五股六股して孕ませても女は誰も彼の悪口を言わない。みんな擁護する。そういう意味では遊び方、女性の扱いを心得ていない人だったんだろうな。勿論今の時代、許されることではないんだろうけど、扱いを間違えなければここまで揉めなかったかな

I know this is totally off base, but I also think that if Watabe and Matsu-chan had treated women as women, it wouldn't have been a problem. Ten thousand yen for just doing what they do...
I heard Takeshi Gundan laughingly said that Tono had to give money to comedians who got into trouble because of female scandals, and even though Shohei Hino was impregnated by a five- or six-way man, no one said anything bad about him. They all defend him. In that sense, he must have been someone who didn't know how to play and how to treat women. Of course, in this day and age, this is probably not acceptable, but if he didn't treat them wrong, he wouldn't have gotten into so much trouble.

性行為があったかないかなんかは録画録音でもない限り証明できない。ホリプロ吉本は単なる飲み会であって全てが嘘であると主張するでしょう。民事訴訟は紛争の解決が目的であり白黒をつける所ではない、吉本も損害賠償を請求する訴訟になり和解でいくらか得るような感じになるのではないでしょうか？そしてそもそも裁判の集中と松本さんが言いましたが全て弁護士がする事で和解を蹴って尋問になれば1度法廷に行くだけですので松本さんの話はおかしな話ですね。そして視聴者は裁判で白黒と言いますが　民事訴訟は如何に過激な主張をする弁護士をつけるかによって結果は左右したりするものですよ。

There is no way to prove whether or not there was sexual intercourse, unless it was recorded on tape. Hollypro Yoshimoto will claim that it was just a drinking session and that everything is a lie. Civil lawsuits are about settling disputes, not black and white, and Yoshimoto will probably be sued for damages and get some in settlement. And what Mr. Matsumoto said about focusing on the trial in the first place is strange, since all the lawyers will do is go to court once for questioning if they kick the settlement out of the case. And the viewers say that the trial is black and white, but the outcome of a civil lawsuit depends on how aggressive the lawyers are in their arguments.