■

中島は１２日、自身のＸ（旧ツイッター）に埼京線の看板前で切符を手にした写真を投稿。「痴漢目的で電車に乗る人へ。今まで通り痴漢できると思うなよ」とつづり、さらに「俺の顔を見て車両を変える人が何人かいました。往復している人も沢山いました」と投稿した。従来のような動画の公開はない。

　この動きに、一部のファンからは活動再開を歓迎する声や「無断撮影と抑え付けさえしなければギリ許されると思う」という意見もある。一方でチャンネルが停止されてもなお、活動に固執する姿勢に「懲りないなーｗ」「一般人としても迷惑です」「全然反省してなくて草」「この電車の中に痴漢がいるに違いない。あの男は痴漢するに違いない。ネタを探さなければならない。こういったバイアスにかかりながらのパトロールは、偏見が生まれ誤った判断をすることになります」などの声も相次いでいる。

Nakajima posted a photo of himself holding a ticket in front of a signboard on the Saikyo Line on his X (formerly Twitter) on January 12. He wrote, "To those who get on the train for the purpose of molestation. Don't think you can be molested as before," he wrote, adding, "There were several people who changed cars when they saw my face. There were also many people going back and forth," he posted. No video was released as in the past.
　This move has been welcomed by some fans who welcome the resumption of activities and say, "As long as you don't film and suppress without permission, I think you are just barely allowed to do so. On the other hand, the attitude of sticking to the activity even after the channel was suspended was met with comments such as "You haven't learned your lesson," "It's annoying even as a civilian," "You don't seem sorry at all, Kusa," "There must be a pervert on this train. That man must be a molester. I have to find a story. Patrolling with this kind of bias will lead to prejudice and wrong judgments," etc.

報道直後、「事実無根であり訴訟を検討」弊社所属タレントの名誉を著しく失墜させる云々、、、
極めて強い意思で所属タレントを護るのか！と思ったら訴訟起こすのが吉本じゃなくて松本個人かよ

Immediately after the news report, he said, "It has no basis in fact and we are considering a lawsuit," "It will seriously damage the reputation of our talent," and so on,
Is he protecting his talents with an extremely strong will? But then I realized that it's not Yoshimoto who's filing the lawsuit, but Matsumoto himself.

過去の事例から名誉毀損が認められても文春側が支払う金額は数百万程度。裁判が長引き記事にして部数や閲覧数が伸びれば数十億の利益をもたらして文春は1人勝ち。
裁判の結果がどう出ようと傷つくのは被害を訴える女性と松本人志。文春はいいポジションにいる。よく考えたものだと感心する。

Based on past cases, even if defamation is admitted, Bunshun will pay only a few million yen. If the trial drags on and the number of copies and views of the article increase, Bunshun will win alone, bringing in billions of dollars in profit.
Regardless of the outcome of the trial, the two people who will be hurt are the woman who is suing for damages and Hitoshi Matsumoto. Bunshun is in a good position. I am impressed that they have thought this through so well.

まあ、一般人にもわかるような記事で、まっちゃんの性的虐待の真実かつ合理的な証拠が示されれば、文春側に有利になるし、そうでなくても、これで文春が勝つという弁護士の言い分は大げさだろうけど、納得はできるけどね

Well, if there is an article that is understandable to the general public that presents true and reasonable evidence of Makchan's sexual abuse, then the advantage will be on Bunshun's side, and even if it isn't, the lawyers' argument that this will win out for Bunshun is probably an exaggeration, though I can accept it

ナンパやコンパは世の中に普通にあってお持ち帰りなんて事もどこにでもあります。後にあれは嫌だったというだけで人を潰す事が出来るなんてとんでもない事じゃない？人気芸能人や役者、バンドマンなんて何百人とやってても不思議じゃ無い

Pick-ups and companionship are common in the world, and take-home girls are everywhere. Isn't it outrageous that you can destroy someone just because you didn't like what you saw afterwards? No wonder popular entertainers, actors, and band members do it with hundreds of people.

裁判結果が出るまで何年？は良いが、まだ松本人志は弁護士も決まって無いんだろ。
吉本興業も、吉本興業ではなく、松本人志個人の裁判とか言い出してるし、テレビ局は、どんな場合も忖度はするが都合が悪くなればジャニーズでも吉本興業でも切り離すのが常套手段なんだから、松本人志単体なら、軽く切り離して終わりだろ。
今回の案件が出てからの松本人志の対応は悪手の連発。
日頃から己で言っていたように文春が来たら素直に認める！という対応をしてたら、現状のような事は無かった。

How many years until the outcome of the trial? I don't care how long it takes to get the results of the trial, but Matsumoto has not even decided on a lawyer yet, has he?
Yoshimoto Kogyo is also saying that the trial is not about Yoshimoto Kogyo, but about Hitoshi Matsumoto himself. TV stations are always ready to make a discovery in any case, but if it becomes inconvenient, they always try to separate the two, whether it is Johnny's or Yoshimoto Kogyo.
After this case came up, Matsumoto Hitoshi's response was a series of bad moves.
If he had responded as he has always said, "If Bunshun comes to me, I will admit it honestly! If he had responded as he has always said he would, we wouldn't be in the situation we are in now.