■

生保をなくして就職率が上がるかといえば現実離れしすぎてる
受給者以外でも職が安定してない現状で更に受給者が見つかるかどうか
これは労働者が働きたいと思っても片想いではなりたたない雇う側の問題両想いを成立させる難度
逆にいえば労働者が働きたいと思えば自由に職につけてすぐ働けるとか雇う側の自由度を下げてやれば

It is too far removed from reality to say that eliminating the welfare system will increase the employment rate.
Even for non-recipients, jobs are not stable, and it's not clear if more recipients can be found.
This is a problem for employers, who cannot have a one-sided love affair with a worker who wants to work, and the difficulty of making both sides of the relationship work.
On the other hand, if workers can get a job freely and immediately if they want to work, or if the employers can reduce the degree of freedom, then it will be possible for them to find a job.

さっきの文章を書いてた時に少子化問題が浮かんだけど「相手を選ばなければいい」でカップルが増えたら少しは少子化解決するよな
けど現状でカップルが増えないから無理なんだよね「選ばなければいい」は机上の空論で

When I was writing the previous sentence, the birthrate problem came to mind, and if the number of couples increased with the "you don't have to choose your partner," that would solve the birthrate problem a little bit, wouldn't it?
But it's impossible because the number of couples is not increasing at the moment.

生活保護受ける上で資産は持てないからな
家と車、有価証券などはすべて売却
貯金は5万以外程度が目安

You can't have any assets when you're on welfare.
Sell your house, car, securities, etc.
The standard amount of savings is about 50,000.

まさか自分が
って事故や病気ってあるからな
そういうための障害年金ではあるがそれだけでは不足する場合もある

I didn't expect it to be me.
There are accidents and illnesses that you never thought you'd have.
That's why the disability pension is designed for them, but it may not be enough in some cases.